Car comparison

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW X5 M (F85)

4.4 V8

575 hp4395 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2018
VS

Rolls-Royce Cullinan

6.7 V12

571 hp6749 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2018-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    575 hp
    429 kW
  • Lightest
    2,275 kg
    5,016 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    253 hp/t
    188 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.7 L/100 km
    16.0 mpg US
    19.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.0 L/100 km
    26.1 mpg US
    31.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    258 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    85/100
  • Best performance score
    82/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    91/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Power
575hp429kW
571hp426kW
Torque
750Nm553lb-ft
850Nm627lb-ft
Curb weight
2,275kg5,016lb
2,660kg5,864lb
Gross weight
2,970kg6,548lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
15.0s
Calculated
19.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
4.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK
22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.3s
Calculated
13.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb
Calculated
215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton
Calculated
320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
766km476mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
4,395cc268cu in
6,749cc412cu in
Length
4,880mm192in
5,341mm210in
Width
1,985mm78in
2,000mm79in
Height
1,754mm69in
1,835mm72in
Wheelbase
2,933mm115in
3,295mm130in
Front track
1,666mm66in
-
Rear track
1,667mm66in
-
Ground clearance
195mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
526L
Max trunk volume
1,870L
-
Doors
5
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
85L
-
CO2 emissions
258g/km
341g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12PowerTorque
  • BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
  • Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,200-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V125,000 rpm1,600 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
4.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
15.0 s
19.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.3 s
5.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.3 s
13.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
184 km/h
115 mph
172 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
571 hp
426 kW

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 4 hp more than Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12.

The biggest power difference is between Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
850 Nm
627 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
2,660 kg
5,864 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V84.2 s
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V125.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 1.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 3.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
575 hp
429 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
571 hp
426 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Power
571 hp
426 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
526 L
18.6 cu ft
Length
5,341 mm
210.3 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Power
571 hp
426 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12
Power
575 hp
429 kW
571 hp
426 kW
Torque
750 Nm
553 lb-ft
850 Nm
627 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
2,275 kg
5,016 lb
2,660 kg
5,864 lb
Fuel consumption
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
15.0 L/100 km
15.7 mpg US
18.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,880 mm
192.1 in
Height
1,754 mm
69.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
526 L
18.6 cu ft
Length
5,341 mm
210.3 in
Height
1,835 mm
72.2 in
Range score
766 km
476 mi
-
CO2 score
258 g/km
341 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
526 L
18.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
253 hp/t
188 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
215 hp/t
160 kW/t
4.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.43 LC100 km26.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.26 LC100 mi42.25 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,914 LC/year3,938 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 385 kg lighter
  • Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 124 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 83 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12

  • Has 100 Nm more

Pros

  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.4 V8
4.4
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (E70)4.4
6.7 V12
AMG GLS 63
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)AMG GLS 63
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX5 M (F95)4.4 V8
6.7 V12
4.4 V8
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsBMWX6 M (F86)4.4 V8
6.7 V12
90D 90 kWh
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsTeslaModel X90D 90 kWh
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8
6.7 V12
4.0 V8
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsBentleyBentayga4.0 V8
4.4 V8
M50i V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX7 (G07)M50i V8
6.7 V12
GLS 600 V8
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsMercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
4.4 V8
4.4 V8
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 M (E71)4.4 V8
6.7 V12
GLS 600 V8
VS
Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12vsMercedes-BenzMaybach GLS (X167)GLS 600 V8
4.4 V8
50i
VS
BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8vsBMWX6 (F16)50i
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 vs Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster