Bentley Bentayga
Car comparison
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8vsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Cullinan
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Fastest top speed290 km/h180 mph
- Lightest2,428 kg5,353 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.6 L/100 km15.1 mpg US18.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.0 L/100 km26.1 mpg US31.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score81/100
- Best performance score84/100
- Best economy score76/100
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Largest trunk526 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 770Nm568lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,428kg5,353lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 69.9s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.5s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.5s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.3s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.4L/100 km20.6mpg US24.8mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 746km463mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,996cc244cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,140mm202in | 5,341mm210in |
| Width | 1,998mm79in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,742mm69in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,995mm118in | 3,295mm130in |
| Trunk volume | 215L | 526L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,774L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 341g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,960-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.3 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.5 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.5 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.2 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 187 km/h 116 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has 21 hp more than Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has more power, Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 3.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.5 s | 290 km/h 180 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 |
| 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BentleyBentayga4.0 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 770 Nm 568 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.5 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 290 km/h 180 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,428 kg 5,353 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.4 L/100 km 20.6 mpg US 24.8 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 746 km 463 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 341 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 215 L 7.6 cu ft | 526 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8 | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.4 L/100 km20.6 mpg US24.8 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.95 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.11 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,710 L452 US gal376 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,993 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Bentley Bentayga 4.0 V8
- Is 232 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Has 311 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























