Tesla Model X
Car comparison
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWhvsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Cullinan
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Largest trunk526 L
- Best overall score80/100
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.0 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,389 kg5,267 lb
- Best power-to-weight220 hp/t164 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Best performance score79/100
Specification comparison
| Model | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 660Nm487lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,389kg5,267lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 3,020kg6,658lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 55.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 220hp/t164kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 276Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | - | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,052mm199in | 5,341mm210in |
| Width | 1,999mm79in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,684mm66in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,965mm117in | 3,295mm130in |
| Front track | 1,711mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | - |
| Ground clearance | 223mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 357L | 526L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,166L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| CO2 emissions | - | 341g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 181 km/h 112 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has 46 hp more than Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 46 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 5.0 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has more power, Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | 525 hp 391 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | TeslaModel X90D 90 kWh | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 660 Nm 487 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,389 kg 5,267 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 341 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 357 L 12.6 cu ft | 526 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 220 hp/t 164 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Tesla Model X 90D 90 kWh
- Is 271 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Has 46 hp more
- Has 190 Nm more
- Has 169 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























