Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8vsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Cullinan
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.0 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions273 g/km
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score75/100
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Lightest2,660 kg5,864 lb
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk526 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 558hp416kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 730Nm538lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,785kg6,140lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 3,250kg7,165lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.5s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 200hp/t149kW/t91hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 3,982cc243cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,205mm205in | 5,341mm210in |
| Width | 2,030mm80in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,838mm72in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,135mm123in | 3,295mm130in |
| Front track | 1,699mm67in | - |
| Rear track | 1,723mm68in | - |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 526L |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 273g/km | 341g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.5 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 4.9 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 558 hp 416 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLS (X167)GLS 600 V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 558 hp 416 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 730 Nm 538 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,785 kg 6,140 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 273 g/km | 341 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 526 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 200 hp/t 149 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8 | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLS (X167) GLS 600 V8
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 68 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 6 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























