BMW X7 (G07)
Car comparison
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8vsRolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonRolls-Royce Cullinan
6.7 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest2,490 kg5,490 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score77/100
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Most powerful571 hp426 kW
- Highest torque850 Nm627 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight215 hp/t160 kW/t4.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk526 L
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530hp395kW | 571hp426kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 850Nm627lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,490kg5,490lb | 2,660kg5,864lb |
| Gross weight | 3,295kg7,264lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.2s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 22.4L/100 km10.5mpg US12.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t160kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 320Nm/t214lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 741km460mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 6,749cc412cu in |
| Length | 5,151mm203in | 5,341mm210in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,805mm71in | 1,835mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 3,105mm122in | 3,295mm130in |
| Front track | 1,682mm66in | - |
| Rear track | 1,703mm67in | - |
| Ground clearance | 221mm9in | - |
| Trunk volume | 326L | 526L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,120L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 6 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 83L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 341g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: Power / Torque
- Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5,000 rpm | 1,600 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.2 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 177 km/h 110 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW |
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has 41 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 5.2 s |
Although Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 has more power, BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 571 hp 426 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 |
| 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Rolls-RoyceCullinan6.7 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp 395 kW | 571 hp 426 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 850 Nm 627 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | 2,660 kg 5,864 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 741 km 460 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 341 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | 526 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 160 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 | Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Emits 83 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Rolls-Royce Cullinan 6.7 V12
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























