BMW X5 M (F85)
Car comparison
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8vsBMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
M50i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful575 hp429 kW
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lightest2,275 kg5,016 lb
- Best power-to-weight253 hp/t188 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range766 km476 mi
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score85/100
- Best performance score82/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score91/100
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 575hp429kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 750Nm553lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,275kg5,016lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,970kg6,548lb | 3,295kg7,264lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.0s Calculated | 17.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.3s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 253hp/t188kW/t115hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 766km476mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,880mm192in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,985mm78in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,754mm69in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,666mm66in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,667mm66in | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 195mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 650L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,870L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 258g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,200-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.0 s | 17.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.3 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 115 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 has 45 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8: 45 hp (34 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 4.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 and BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 766 km 476 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 575 hp 429 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 M (F85)4.4 V8 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 575 hp 429 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,275 kg 5,016 lb | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 766 km 476 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 258 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 253 hp/t 188 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8 | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 M (F85) 4.4 V8
- Has 45 hp more
- Is 215 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Has 324 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























