BMW X5 M (E70)
Car comparison
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4vsBMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X7 (G07)
M50i V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful555 hp414 kW
- Lightest2,305 kg5,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk620 L
- Best overall score83/100
- Best practicality score90/100
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Highest torque750 Nm553 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.2 L/100 km21.0 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.3 L/100 km15.4 mpg US18.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions258 g/km
- Best estimated range741 km460 mi
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 555hp414kW | 530hp395kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 750Nm553lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,490kg5,490lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 3,295kg7,264lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s | 17.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 741km460mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,851mm191in | 5,151mm203in |
| Width | 1,994mm79in | 2,000mm79in |
| Height | 1,764mm69in | 1,805mm71in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 3,105mm122in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,682mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,703mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 207mm8in | 221mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 620L | 326L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | 2,120L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 6 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 83L |
| CO2 emissions | 325g/km | 258g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: Power / Torque
- BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,800-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 17.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW |
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 has 25 hp more than BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 25 hp (19 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 4.7 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 4.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 and BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 741 km 460 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 530 hp 395 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX7 (G07)M50i V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 555 hp 414 kW | 530 hp 395 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 750 Nm 553 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb | 2,490 kg 5,490 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 741 km 460 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 325 g/km | 258 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | 326 L 11.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 | BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 19.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 2,940 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Has 25 hp more
- Is 185 kg lighter
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 294 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
BMW X7 (G07) M50i V8
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 67 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























