BMW X5 M (E70)
Car comparison
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4vsBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Lightest2,305 kg5,082 lb
- Best power-to-weight241 hp/t180 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption19.3 L/100 km12.2 mpg US14.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range612 km380 mi
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best economy score70/100
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 555hp414kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 680Nm502lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,305kg5,082lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,905kg6,404lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s | 17.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 241hp/t180kW/t109hp/1000 lb Calculated | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 612km380mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,851mm191in | 4,876mm192in |
| Width | 1,994mm79in | 1,983mm78in |
| Height | 1,764mm69in | 1,983mm78in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,660mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,672mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 207mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 620L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,750L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 325g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 17.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 178 km/h 111 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 5 hp more than BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 4.7 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
Although BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has more power, BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 612 km 380 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 555 hp 414 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX5 M (E70)4.4 | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 555 hp 414 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,305 kg 5,082 lb | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 612 km 380 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 325 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 620 L 21.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 241 hp/t 180 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4 | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 24.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,649 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X5 M (E70) 4.4
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Has 5 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























