BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8vsBMW X6 (F16) 50i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW X6 (F16)
50i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
- Best practicality score92/100
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
- Lightest2,170 kg4,784 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.1 L/100 km18.0 mpg US21.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range876 km545 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 650Nm479lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,170kg4,784lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 2,885kg6,360lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 65.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 17.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 13.1L/100 km18mpg US21.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 207hp/t155kW/t94hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 876km545mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,876mm192in | 4,909mm193in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,989mm78in |
| Height | 1,983mm78in | 1,702mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 2,933mm115in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,640mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,706mm67in |
| Ground clearance | - | 212mm8in |
| Trunk volume | - | 550L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 227g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW X6 (F16) 50i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 17.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 450 hp 336 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 110 hp more than BMW X6 (F16) 50i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 110 hp (82 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 4.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and BMW X6 (F16) 50i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X6 (F16) 50i and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 4.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 612 km 380 mi |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 876 km 545 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)50i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWX6 (F16)50i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X6 (F16) 50i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| BMWX6 (F16)50i | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | BMWX6 (F16)50i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 650 Nm 479 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,170 kg 4,784 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 876 km 545 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 227 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 550 L 19.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 207 hp/t 155 kW/t 4.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 | BMW X6 (F16) 50i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Has 110 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
BMW X6 (F16) 50i
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Uses 4.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 265 km (165 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























