BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012
Car comparison
BMW X6 M (E71) · Facelift 2012 4.4 V8vsMercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GL (X166)
AMG GL 63
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Lightest2,380 kg5,247 lb
- Best power-to-weight235 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score83/100
- Best performance score79/100
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63
- Highest torque760 Nm561 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption15.8 L/100 km14.9 mpg US17.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 560hp418kW | 558hp416kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 760Nm561lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,380kg5,247lb | 2,505kg5,523lb |
| Gross weight | 2,905kg6,404lb | 3,250kg7,165lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 71.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 78.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 19.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13.9L/100 km16.9mpg US20.3mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 19.3L/100 km12.2mpg US14.6mpg UK | 15.8L/100 km14.9mpg US17.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 235hp/t175kW/t107hp/1000 lb Calculated | 223hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 612km380mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,876mm192in | 5,141mm202in |
| Width | 1,983mm78in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,983mm78in | 1,850mm73in |
| Wheelbase | 2,933mm115in | 3,075mm121in |
| Front track | 1,660mm65in | 1,677mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,672mm66in | 1,696mm67in |
| Trunk volume | - | 680L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,300L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 100L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 288g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 6,000 rpm | 1,500-5,650 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 5,250-5,750 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 19.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 175 km/h 109 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 558 hp 416 kW |
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 has 2 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 4.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 and Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 and BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 612 km 380 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 558 hp 416 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 |
| 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX6 M (E71)Facelift 20124.4 V8 | Mercedes-BenzGL (X166)AMG GL 63 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 560 hp 418 kW | 558 hp 416 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 760 Nm 561 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,380 kg 5,247 lb | 2,505 kg 5,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.9 L/100 km 16.9 mpg US 20.3 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 612 km 380 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 288 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 680 L 24.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 235 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 223 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8 | Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13.9 L/100 km16.9 mpg US20.3 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 24.33 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 39.15 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,085 L551 US gal459 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,649 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X6 M (E71) Facelift 2012 4.4 V8
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz GL (X166) AMG GL 63
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 201 km (125 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























