Renault Latitude
Car comparison
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6vsNissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Teana II
3.5i V6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Highest torque330 Nm243 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score63/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
- Most powerful249 hp186 kW
- Lightest1,581 kg3,486 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.8 L/100 km17.0 mpg US20.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range686 km426 mi
- Largest trunk488 L
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 249hp186kW |
| Torque | 330Nm243lb-ft | 326Nm240lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,581kg3,486lb |
| Gross weight | 2,180kg4,806lb | 2,060kg4,542lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.9s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 60.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.1s Calculated | 28.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.4s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 149hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 686km426mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,897mm193in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,832mm72in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,483mm58in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,762mm109in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | 1,565mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,550mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 488L |
| Max trunk volume | 511L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 250g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Latitude 3.5 V6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 6,000 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.1 s | 28.1 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.4 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 102 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 249 hp 186 kW |
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V has 9 hp more than Renault Latitude 3.5 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 6.4 s |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 7.2 s |
Although Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V has more power, Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 and Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 667 km 414 mi |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 686 km 426 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 240 hp 179 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 249 hp 186 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V |
| 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultLatitude3.5 V6 | NissanTeana II3.5i V6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 249 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 330 Nm 243 lb-ft | 326 Nm 240 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,581 kg 3,486 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km 23.1 mpg US 27.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 686 km 426 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 250 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 488 L 17.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 149 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Latitude 3.5 V6 | Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 17.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 28.73 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,678 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Latitude 3.5 V6
- Has 4 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Nissan Teana II 3.5i V6 24V
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 34 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 20 km (12 mi) more estimated range
- Has 11 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























