Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 3vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 2vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 1vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 3)

825 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 2)

715 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6 (Stage 1)

649 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

550 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    368 km/h
    229 mph
  • Most powerful
    825 hp
    615 kW
  • Highest torque
    980 Nm
    723 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    474 hp/t
    354 kW/t
    2.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.8 L/100 km
    26.7 mpg US
    32.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    80/100
  • Best performance score
    95/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
825hp615kW+275 hp
715hp533kW+165 hp
649hp484kW+99 hp
550hp410kW
Torque
980Nm723lb-ft+348 Nm
853Nm629lb-ft+221 Nm
771Nm569lb-ft+139 Nm
632Nm466lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
1,740kg3,836lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
+53 km/h
353 km/h
219 mph
+38 km/h
344 km/h
214 mph
+29 km/h
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
31.4s99% target: 364 km/h / 226 mph-8.9 s
Calculated
34.8s99% target: 349 km/h / 217 mph-5.5 s
Calculated
37.7s99% target: 341 km/h / 212 mph-2.6 s
Calculated
40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.2s-0.6 s
2.4s-0.4 s
2.5s-0.3 s
2.8s
0-200 km/h
5.4s-2.6 s
Calculated
6.1s-1.8 s
Calculated
6.7s-1.3 s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.1s-0.6 s
Calculated
2.3s-0.4 s
Calculated
2.4s-0.3 s
Calculated
2.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
8.9s-1.3 s
Calculated
9.4s-0.9 s
Calculated
9.7s-0.6 s
Calculated
10.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
474hp/t354kW/t215hp/1000 lb
Calculated
411hp/t306kW/t186hp/1000 lb
Calculated
373hp/t278kW/t169hp/1000 lb
Calculated
316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
563Nm/t377lb-ft/ton
Calculated
490Nm/t328lb-ft/ton
Calculated
443Nm/t296lb-ft/ton
Calculated
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
627km390mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
4,670mm184in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
1,590mm63in
Rear track
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
105mm4in
Trunk volume
315L
315L
315L
315L
Doors
2
2
2
2
Seats
4
4
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
74L
74L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 715 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 649 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hpPowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 715 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 649 hp: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp6,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.1 s
2.3 s
2.4 s
2.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.2 s
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
5.4 s
6.1 s
6.7 s
7.9 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
14.2 s
18.1 s
22.0 s
-
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.6 s
1.7 s
1.7 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.0 s
4.2 s
4.3 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
5.9 s
6.2 s
6.4 s
6.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
7.6 s
7.9 s
8.2 s
8.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
8.9 s
9.4 s
9.7 s
10.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
268 km/h
167 mph
254 km/h
158 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
228 km/h
141 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
825 hp
615 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
715 hp
533 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
649 hp
484 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
550 hp
410 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp has 275 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp: 275 hp (205 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
980 Nm
723 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
853 Nm
629 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
771 Nm
569 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
632 Nm
466 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
1,740 kg
3,836 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp2.2 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp2.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp2.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp: 0.6 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 715 hp and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 649 hp, separated by only 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
474 hp/t
354 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
411 hp/t
306 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
373 hp/t
278 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
627 km
390 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
627 km
390 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
627 km
390 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
825 hp
615 kW
2.2 s
368 km/h
229 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
715 hp
533 kW
2.4 s
353 km/h
219 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
649 hp
484 kW
2.5 s
344 km/h
214 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
550 hp
410 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
Power
825 hp
615 kW
0-100 km/h2.2 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
Power
715 hp
533 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
Power
825 hp
615 kW
0-100 km/h2.2 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
Power
715 hp
533 kW
0-100 km/h2.4 s
Top speed
353 km/h
219 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
Power
649 hp
484 kW
0-100 km/h2.5 s
Top speed
344 km/h
214 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.2 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.5 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hp
474 hp/t
354 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hp
411 hp/t
306 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hp
373 hp/t
278 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 3)825 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 2)715 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 (Stage 1)649 hpNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6550 hp
Power
825 hp
615 kW
715 hp
533 kW
649 hp
484 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
980 Nm
723 lb-ft
853 Nm
629 lb-ft
771 Nm
569 lb-ft
632 Nm
466 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.2 s
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.8 s
Top speed
368 km/h
229 mph
353 km/h
219 mph
344 km/h
214 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
627 km
390 mi
627 km
390 mi
627 km
390 mi
627 km
390 mi
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
474 hp/t
354 kW/t
2.1 kg/hp
411 hp/t
306 kW/t
2.4 kg/hp
373 hp/t
278 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 2) 715 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 1) 649 hpNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 550 hp
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year3,098 LC/year3,098 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 (Stage 3) 825 hp

  • Has 110 hp more
  • Has 126 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 63 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAudiR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAudiR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
3.8 V6
R 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
3.8 V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8
3.8 V6
4.5 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8
3.8 V6
FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 3 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 2 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 · Stage 1 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster