Porsche 911 (991 II)
Car comparison
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010
3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Highest torque710 Nm524 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight339 hp/t252 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range747 km464 mi
- Best performance score94/100
- Best economy score82/100
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 540hp403kW | 550hp410kW |
| Torque | 710Nm524lb-ft | 632Nm466lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 2,010kg4,431lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 45.8s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.0s | 2.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.3s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.9s Calculated | 2.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.4s Calculated | 10.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 339hp/t252kW/t154hp/1000 lb Calculated | 316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 445Nm/t298lb-ft/ton Calculated | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 747km464mi Calculated | 627km390mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,800cc232cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,507mm177in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,297mm51in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,541mm61in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 115L | 315L |
| Max trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 212g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 6,400 rpm | 2,250-4,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,800 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.0 s | 2.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 36.3 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 1.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.7 s | 4.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.8 s | 8.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.4 s | 10.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 226 km/h 141 mph | 228 km/h 141 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 540 hp 403 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 550 hp 410 kW |
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 has 10 hp more than Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 632 Nm 466 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 3.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: 2.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 339 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 747 km 464 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 540 hp 403 kW | 3.0 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 550 hp 410 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 3.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | 339 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Porsche911 (991 II)Turbo 3.8 | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 540 hp 403 kW | 550 hp 410 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 710 Nm 524 lb-ft | 632 Nm 466 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.0 s | 2.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 747 km 464 mi | 627 km 390 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 212 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 115 L 4.1 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 339 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 316 hp/t 236 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8 | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 20.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,098 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche 911 (991 II) Turbo 3.8
- Has 78 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 120 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























