Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6vsJaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

3.8 V6

550 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2012-2016
VS

Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2011-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    550 hp
    410 kW
  • Lightest
    1,740 kg
    3,836 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    316 hp/t
    236 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    627 km
    390 mi
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    92/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550hp410kW
550hp410kW
Torque
632Nm466lb-ft
680Nm502lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,753kg3,865lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
2,145kg4,729lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
40.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
66.0s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
2.8s
4.4s
0-200 km/h
7.9s
Calculated
12.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
2.7s
Calculated
4.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.2s
Calculated
12.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
316hp/t236kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
314hp/t234kW/t142hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
388Nm/t260lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
627km390mi
Calculated
574km357mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
5,000cc305cu in
Length
4,670mm184in
4,804mm189in
Width
1,895mm75in
-
Height
1,370mm54in
1,312mm52in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,752mm108in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,600mm63in
-
Ground clearance
105mm4in
100mm4in
Trunk volume
315L
330L
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
74L
71L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm6,650 rpm
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,000-6,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
2.7 s
4.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
2.8 s
4.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
7.9 s
12.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.8 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
4.5 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
6.7 s
8.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
8.6 s
10.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.2 s
12.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
228 km/h
141 mph
197 km/h
122 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
550 hp
410 kW
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
632 Nm
466 lb-ft
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,753 kg
3,865 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V62.8 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 1.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 and Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
627 km
390 mi
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
574 km
357 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
550 hp
410 kW
2.8 s
315 km/h
196 mph
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.4 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h2.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.8 s
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
550 hp
410 kW
Torque
632 Nm
466 lb-ft
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Acceleration
2.8 s
4.4 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,753 kg
3,865 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,670 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,804 mm
189.1 in
Height
1,312 mm
51.7 in
Range score
627 km
390 mi
574 km
357 mi
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
330 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
316 hp/t
236 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
314 hp/t
234 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 3.8 V6

  • Is 13 kg lighter
  • Is 1.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) R-S 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
R-S 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10 plus
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Coupe (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10 plus
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)Facelift 2009R 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
5.2 FSI V10
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsAUDIR8 Spyder (42)Facelift 20125.2 FSI V10
R-S 5.0 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Convertible (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.8 V6
R 5.0 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsJaguarF-type CoupeR 5.0 V8
3.8 V6
3.9 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 3.8 V6 vs Jaguar XK Coupe (X150) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster