Car comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6vsWiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Nissan GT-R (R35)

3.8 V6

485 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2007-2010
VS

Wiesmann GT MF4

4.4 V8

407 hp4395 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboCoupe2003-2014

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    320 km/h
    199 mph Unrestricted
    310 km/h
    193 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    485 hp
    362 kW
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.1 L/100 km
    25.8 mpg US
    31.0 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    597 km
    371 mi
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    90/100
  • Best economy score
    74/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

  • Highest torque
    600 Nm
    443 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,455 kg
    3,208 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    280 hp/t
    209 kW/t
    3.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    12.3 L/100 km
    19.1 mpg US
    23.0 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.2 L/100 km
    13.7 mpg US
    16.4 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
485hp362kW
407hp304kW
Torque
588Nm434lb-ft
600Nm443lb-ft
Curb weight
1,740kg3,836lb
1,455kg3,208lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Calculated
291 km/h
181 mph
To 99% top speed
55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph
Calculated
61.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.5s
4.6s
0-200 km/h
10.1s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
4.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK
12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK
17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.2s
Calculated
12.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb
Calculated
280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton
Calculated
412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
597km371mi
Calculated
569km354mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,799cc232cu in
4,395cc268cu in
Length
4,650mm183in
4,230mm167in
Width
1,895mm75in
1,880mm74in
Height
1,370mm54in
1,190mm47in
Wheelbase
2,780mm109in
2,507mm99in
Front track
1,590mm63in
-
Rear track
1,600mm63in
-
Ground clearance
105mm4in
-
Trunk volume
315L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
74L
70L
CO2 emissions-
285g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
  • Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V66,400 rpm3,200-5,200 rpm6,650 rpm
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V85,500-6,400 rpm1,750-4,500 rpm6,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
4.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.5 s
4.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.1 s
13.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Likely limited
291 km/h
181 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.2 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.4 s
8.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.5 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.2 s
12.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
211 km/h
131 mph
190 km/h
118 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
485 hp
362 kW
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 has 78 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: 78 hp (58 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
588 Nm
434 lb-ft
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
600 Nm
443 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
1,455 kg
3,208 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
291 km/h
181 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V63.5 s
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V84.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
597 km
371 mi
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
569 km
354 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
485 hp
362 kW
3.5 s
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
407 hp
304 kW
4.6 s
291 km/h
181 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Power
485 hp
362 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
Power
485 hp
362 kW
0-100 km/h3.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
407 hp
304 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
291 km/h
181 mph
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
3.5 s
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
4.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8
Power
485 hp
362 kW
407 hp
304 kW
Torque
588 Nm
434 lb-ft
600 Nm
443 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.5 s
4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
320 km/h199 mph
Restricted
310 km/h193 mph
291 km/h
181 mph
Lightness
1,740 kg
3,836 lb
1,455 kg
3,208 lb
Fuel consumption
12.4 L/100 km
19.0 mpg US
22.8 mpg UK
12.3 L/100 km
19.1 mpg US
23.0 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,650 mm
183.1 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,190 mm
46.9 in
Range score
597 km
371 mi
569 km
354 mi
CO2 score
-
285 g/km
Trunk score
315 L
11.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
279 hp/t
208 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
280 hp/t
209 kW/t
3.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleNissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
Consumption12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km21.70 LC100 km21.53 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi34.92 LC100 mi34.64 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,255 LC/year3,229 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6

  • Has 78 hp more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8

  • Has 12 Nm more
  • Is 285 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 20103.8 V6
4.4 V8
4.0 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsBMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8
3.8 V6
Track Edition 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Track Edition 3.8 V6
4.4 V8
GT3 3.6
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsPorsche911 (997)GT3 3.6
4.4 V8
6.0 i V12 48V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsAston MartinDB9 Coupe6.0 i V12 48V
3.8 V6
AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzCLK (C209)Facelift 2005AMG CLK 63 Black Series V8
4.4 V8
R 4.2 V8
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)R 4.2 V8
3.8 V6
Turbo 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (997)Facelift 2008Turbo 3.8
4.4 V8
4.2 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsMaseratiGranSport4.2 i V8 32V
3.8 V6
Z06 7.0 i V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6vsChevroletCorvette Coupe (C6)Z06 7.0 i V8
4.4 V8
S 4.7 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsMaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V
4.4 V8
4.3 i V8 32V
VS
WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8vsAston MartinV8 Vantage4.3 i V8 32V
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 vs Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster