Maserati GranTurismo I
Car comparison
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32VvsWiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonWiesmann GT MF4
4.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range569 km354 mi
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score74/100
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Most powerful440 hp328 kW
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 440hp328kW | 407hp304kW |
| Torque | 490Nm361lb-ft | 600Nm443lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,455kg3,208lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.1s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 61.9s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.8L/100 km9.1mpg US10.9mpg UK | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 261Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 531km330mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,691cc286cu in | 4,395cc268cu in |
| Length | 4,881mm192in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,353mm53in | 1,190mm47in |
| Wheelbase | 2,942mm116in | 2,507mm99in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | - |
| Rear track | 1,560mm61in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 285g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 13.9 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 190 km/h 118 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW |
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has 33 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 33 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
Although Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V has more power, Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 531 km 330 mi |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 440 hp 328 kW | 4.9 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW | 4.6 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V |
| 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK |
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiGranTurismo IS 4.7 i V8 32V | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 440 hp 328 kW | 407 hp 304 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 490 Nm 361 lb-ft | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 291 km/h 181 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.2 L/100 km 14.5 mpg US 17.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 531 km 330 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 285 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V | Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.2 L/100 km14.5 mpg US17.4 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 28.35 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 45.62 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,430 L642 US gal535 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,253 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati GranTurismo I S 4.7 i V8 32V
- Has 33 hp more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 425 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 38 km (24 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























