Wiesmann GT MF4
Car comparison
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8vsBMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW M3 Coupe (E92)
4.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed291 km/h181 mph
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lightest1,455 kg3,208 lb
- Best power-to-weight280 hp/t209 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.2 L/100 km13.7 mpg US16.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range569 km354 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score74/100
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Most powerful420 hp313 kW
- Lowest highway consumption9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK
- Best practicality score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 407hp304kW | 420hp313kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | 1,580kg3,483lb |
| Gross weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.5s99% target: 288 km/h / 179 mph Calculated | 58.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 15.8s |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.2L/100 km13.7mpg US16.4mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 280hp/t209kW/t127hp/1000 lb Calculated | 266hp/t198kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 412Nm/t276lb-ft/ton Calculated | 253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 508km316mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,395cc268cu in | 3,999cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,230mm167in | 4,615mm182in |
| Width | 1,880mm74in | 1,804mm71in |
| Height | 1,190mm47in | 1,424mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,507mm99in | 2,761mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,540mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,539mm61in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 285g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8: Power / Torque
- BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 5,500-6,400 rpm | 1,750-4,500 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 8,300 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 8,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW |
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 has 13 hp more than Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 4.6 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 4.8 s |
Although BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 has more power, Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 and BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 569 km 354 mi |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 508 km 316 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 407 hp 304 kW | 4.6 s | 291 km/h 181 mph |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 420 hp 313 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
| BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WiesmannGT MF44.4 V8 | BMWM3 Coupe (E92)4.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 407 hp 304 kW | 420 hp 313 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 291 km/h 181 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,455 kg 3,208 lb | 1,580 kg 3,483 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 508 km 316 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 285 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 280 hp/t 209 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 266 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8 | BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.53 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,229 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Wiesmann GT MF4 4.4 V8
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 26 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
BMW M3 Coupe (E92) 4.0 V8
- Has 13 hp more
Pros
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























