Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsVolvo XC40 2.0 T4
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC40
2.0 T4
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,575 kg3,472 lb
- Best power-to-weight121 hp/t90 kW/t8.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions130 g/km
- Best estimated range1,041 km647 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Largest trunk460 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,575kg3,472lb | 1,647kg3,631lb |
| Gross weight | 2,170kg4,784lb | 2,160kg4,762lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.9s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 88.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 38.7s Calculated | 53.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,041km647mi Calculated | 818km508mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,425mm174in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,863mm73in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,702mm106in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,626mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 54L |
| CO2 emissions | 130g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 4,700 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 4,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 38.7 s | 53.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.1 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 8.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo XC40 2.0 T4: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 818 km 508 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC402.0 T4 | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0 | VolvoXC402.0 T4 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,575 kg 3,472 lb | 1,647 kg 3,631 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,041 km 647 mi | 818 km 508 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 130 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 | Volvo XC40 2.0 T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 72 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 223 km (138 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 24 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volvo XC40 2.0 T4
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























