Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0vsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper SD 2.0

190 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    360 Nm
    266 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,575 kg
    3,472 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    130 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,041 km
    647 mi
  • Largest trunk
    450 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
360Nm266lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,575kg3,472lb
1,876kg4,136lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,479kg5,465lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
79.0s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
38.8s
Calculated
51.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,041km647mi
Calculated
845km525mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,791mm110in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
191mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
270L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
2,005L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
130g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.04,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.8 s
51.2 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
1,876 kg
4,136 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
218 km/h
135 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.07.6 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
1,041 km
647 mi
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
845 km
525 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.6 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,575 kg
3,472 lb
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
1,041 km
647 mi
845 km
525 mi
CO2 score
130 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0

  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 301 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 196 km (122 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 180 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 33 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Cooper SD 2.0
40 TFSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TFSI
2.0 TSI
40 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 B4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
Cooper SD 2.0
20d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper SD 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper SD 2.0 vs Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster