Car comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949)

2.2 JTDM

190 hp2143 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2022
VS

Skoda Kodiaq I

2.0 TSI

190 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2019-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    210 km/h
    130 mph
  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,745 kg
    3,847 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    109 hp/t
    81 kW/t
    9.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    160 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    951 km
    591 mi
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190hp142kW
190hp142kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
320Nm236lb-ft
Curb weight
1,745kg3,847lb
1,876kg4,136lb
Gross weight-
2,479kg5,465lb
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.6s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
48.8s
Calculated
51.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.2s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.5s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb
Calculated
101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
951km591mi
Calculated
845km525mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,697mm185in
Width
1,903mm75in
1,882mm74in
Height
1,693mm67in
1,659mm65in
Wheelbase
2,818mm111in
2,791mm110in
Front track-
1,586mm62in
Rear track-
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance-
191mm8in
Trunk volume-
270L
Max trunk volume-
2,005L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
7
Fuel tank
58L
60L
CO2 emissions
160g/km
163g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSIPowerTorque
  • Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM3,500 rpm1,750 rpm3,750 rpm
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI4,200-6,000 rpm1,500-4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.2 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.6 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
48.8 s
51.2 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.5 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
144 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
1,876 kg
4,136 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
210 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM7.6 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM and Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
951 km
591 mi
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
845 km
525 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
190 hp
142 kW
7.6 s
210 km/h
130 mph
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
210 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.6 s
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMSkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.6 s
7.7 s
Top speed
210 km/h
130 mph
210 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,745 kg
3,847 lb
1,876 kg
4,136 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.1 L/100 km
33.1 mpg US
39.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,693 mm
66.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Length
4,697 mm
184.9 in
Height
1,659 mm
65.3 in
Range score
951 km
591 mi
845 km
525 mi
CO2 score
160 g/km
163 g/km
Trunk score
-
270 L
9.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
109 hp/t
81 kW/t
9.2 kg/hp
101 hp/t
76 kW/t
9.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleAlfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDMSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km12.42 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi20.00 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,864 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM

  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Is 131 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 3 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.2 JTDM
2.2 MultiJet II
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)Facelift 20222.2 MultiJet II
2.0 TSI
2.2 JTDM
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDM
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonale1.5 VGT
2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsSeatTarraco2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
330TSI
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
2.2 JTDM
40 TDI
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)40 TDI
2.0 TSI
2.0 B4
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 B4
2.2 JTDM
2.0 D4
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsVolvoXC402.0 D4
2.0 TSI
350h
VS
SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSIvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.2 JTDM
20d
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsBMWX2 (F39)20d
2.2 JTDM
1.5 VGT
VS
Alfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2 JTDMvsAlfa RomeoTonaleFacelift 20251.5 VGT
Alfa Romeo Stelvio (949) 2.2 JTDM vs Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster