Seat Tarraco
Car comparison
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSIvsSkoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq I
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range845 km525 mi
- Largest trunk270 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Fastest top speed211 km/h131 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,733 kg3,821 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,733kg3,821lb | 1,876kg4,136lb |
| Gross weight | 2,520kg5,556lb | 2,479kg5,465lb |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.2s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 84.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 49.1s Calculated | 51.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 101hp/t76kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated | 171Nm/t114lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 822km511mi Calculated | 845km525mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,735mm186in | 4,697mm185in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,882mm74in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,790mm110in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,574mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 192mm8in | 191mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 230L | 270L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 2,005L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 163g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 49.1 s | 51.2 s |
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 89 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 822 km 511 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 845 km 525 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | SkodaKodiaq I2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 211 km/h 131 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | 1,876 kg 4,136 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 822 km 511 mi | 845 km 525 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 163 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | 270 L 9.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 101 hp/t 76 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI | Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Is 143 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq I 2.0 TSI
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























