BMW X2 (F39)
Car comparison
BMW X2 (F39) 20ivsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed224 km/h139 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range910 km566 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,733kg3,821lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,520kg5,556lb |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 222 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 83.1s99% target: 209 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.8s Calculated | 49.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 910km566mi Calculated | 822km511mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,360mm172in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,824mm72in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,526mm60in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,562mm61in | 1,574mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 182mm7in | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 230L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,355L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW X2 (F39) 20i: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.8 s | 49.0 s |
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 144 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
BMW X2 (F39) 20i has 2 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI and BMW X2 (F39) 20i: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 211 km/h 131 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 7.8 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW X2 (F39) 20i and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 910 km 566 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 822 km 511 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.8 s | 224 km/h 139 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.0 s | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW X2 (F39) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWX2 (F39)20i | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWX2 (F39)20i | SeatTarraco2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 224 km/h 139 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,733 kg 3,821 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 910 km 566 mi | 822 km 511 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 230 L 8.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW X2 (F39) 20i | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 12.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,916 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW X2 (F39) 20i
- Has 2 hp more
- Is 193 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 89 km (55 mi) more estimated range
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TSI
- Has 40 Nm more
Pros
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























