Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk240 L
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best overall score45/100
- Best performance score53/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 240L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 984 km 611 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 150 km (93 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 15 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























