Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8vsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)

SLK 200 1.8

184 hp1796 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2011-2015
VS

Mini Roadster (R59)

Cooper S 1.6

184 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedRoadster2012-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

  • Lightest
    1,185 kg
    2,612 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    116 kW/t
    6.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    240 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    30/100

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.0 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    270 Nm
    199 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    923 km
    574 mi
  • Best overall score
    45/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184hp137kW
184hp137kW
Torque
270Nm199lb-ft
260Nm192lb-ft
Curb weight
1,360kg2,998lb
1,185kg2,612lb
Gross weight
1,750kg3,858lb
1,475kg3,252lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
80.8s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.0s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
28.5s
Calculated
31.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.6s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.0s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton
Calculated
219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
923km574mi
Calculated
833km518mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,796cc110cu in
1,598cc98cu in
Length
4,134mm163in
3,734mm147in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,683mm66in
Height
1,301mm51in
1,390mm55in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
2,467mm97in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,453mm57in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,461mm58in
Ground clearance-
134mm5in
Trunk volume
225L
240L
Max trunk volume
335L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
50L
CO2 emissions
151g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: Power / Torque
  • Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.85,250 rpm1,800-4,600 rpm5,500 rpm
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.65,500 rpm1,730-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.6 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.5 s
31.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
9.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.0 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
96 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
184 hp
137 kW
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
260 Nm
192 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
1,185 kg
2,612 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
237 km/h
147 mph
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.87.0 s
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.67.0 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
923 km
574 mi
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
833 km
518 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
184 hp
137 kW
7.0 s
237 km/h
147 mph
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
184 hp
137 kW
7.0 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
3,734 mm
147.0 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
7.0 s
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Power
184 hp
137 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
270 Nm
199 lb-ft
260 Nm
192 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.0 s
7.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,360 kg
2,998 lb
1,185 kg
2,612 lb
Fuel consumption
6.5 L/100 km
36.2 mpg US
43.5 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
3,734 mm
147.0 in
Height
1,390 mm
54.7 in
Range score
923 km
574 mi
833 km
518 mi
CO2 score
151 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
225 L
7.9 cu ft
240 L
8.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
135 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
155 hp/t
116 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.38 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.31 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used975 L258 US gal214 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,706 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6

  • Is 175 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 15 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 12 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SLK 200 1.8
SLK 230 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Cooper S 1.6
SLK 200 1.8
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8
SLK 200 1.8
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008SLK 350 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8S)2.0 TDI
SLK 200 1.8
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI
SLK 200 1.8
AMG SLK 32 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TFSI
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsAUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI
SLK 200 1.8
Cooper S 1.6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 1.8vsMiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 1.6
S Cup 1.8
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsLotusElise (SERIES 3)S Cup 1.8
Cooper S 1.6
20i
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsBMWZ4 (G29)20i
Cooper S 1.6
28i
VS
MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6vsBMWZ4 (E89)28i
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 1.8 vs Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster