BMW Z4 (E89)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (E89) 28ivsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful245 hp183 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight164 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions139 g/km
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245hp183kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.6s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 809km503mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,239mm167in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,790mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,291mm51in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,496mm98in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,511mm59in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,559mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 159g/km | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.6 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i has 61 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 61 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp 183 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 809 km 503 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 159 g/km | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Has 61 hp more
- Has 90 Nm more
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 km/h (21 mph) higher top speed
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 310 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 25 km (15 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 20 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























