AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010
Car comparison
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) · Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSIvsBMW Z4 (E89) 28i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonBMW Z4 (E89)
28i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lightest1,495 kg3,296 lb
- Best power-to-weight182 hp/t136 kW/t5.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score63/100
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.4 L/100 km25.0 mpg US30.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 272hp203kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,495kg3,296lb | 1,495kg3,296lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,750kg3,858lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 73.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.8s Calculated | 19.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 182hp/t136kW/t83hp/1000 lb Calculated | 164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km472mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,198mm165in | 4,239mm167in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,350mm53in | 1,291mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,496mm98in |
| Front track | 1,555mm61in | 1,511mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- BMW Z4 (E89) 28i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 6,000 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.8 s | 19.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 5.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 106 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW |
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI has 27 hp more than BMW Z4 (E89) 28i.
The biggest power difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 5.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 5.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW Z4 (E89) 28i and AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 759 km 472 mi |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
| BMWZ4 (E89)28i | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITTS Roadster (8J)Facelift 20102.0 TFSI | BMWZ4 (E89)28i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 272 hp 203 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | 1,495 kg 3,296 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 472 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 182 hp/t 136 kW/t 5.5 kg/hp | 164 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI | BMW Z4 (E89) 28i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.83 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,074 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TTS Roadster (8J) Facelift 2010 2.0 TFSI
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
BMW Z4 (E89) 28i
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 49 km (31 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























