AUDI TT Roadster (8J)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSIvsMini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Roadster (R59)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk250 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score30/100
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,185 kg2,612 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t116 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,185kg2,612lb |
| Gross weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,475kg3,252lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.3s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.1s Calculated | 31.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t116kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 199Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,178mm164in | 3,734mm147in |
| Width | 1,842mm73in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,358mm53in | 1,390mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,572mm62in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 134mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 240L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 139g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 5,100-6,000 rpm | 1,700-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,730-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.1 s | 31.0 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI has 16 hp more than Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 6.4 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI and Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 and AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 769 km 478 mi |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.4 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.0 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8J)2.0 TFSI | MiniRoadster (R59)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,185 kg 2,612 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 139 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 240 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 116 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI | Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 10.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 1,575 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8J) 2.0 TFSI
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Roadster (R59) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 220 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 64 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























