Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 230 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed237 km/h147 mph
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best overall score45/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score29/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Most powerful193 hp144 kW
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,405kg3,097lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,795kg3,957lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.2s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 984km611mi Calculated | 570km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 2,295cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,301mm51in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,565mm62in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.2 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 7.4 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 3.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 984 km 611 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 570 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 237 km/h 147 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 984 km 611 mi | 570 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 414 km (257 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Has 9 hp more
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























