Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)

SLK 200 2.0

184 hp1991 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2015-2016
VS

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170)

SLK 230 Kompressor

193 hp2295 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedRoadster1996-2000

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    237 km/h
    147 mph
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.1 L/100 km
    38.6 mpg US
    46.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.9 L/100 km
    29.8 mpg US
    35.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    984 km
    611 mi
  • Largest trunk
    225 L
  • Best overall score
    45/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    29/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Power
184hp137kW
193hp144kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,250kg2,756lb
Gross weight
1,795kg3,957lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
80.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph
Calculated
77.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.9s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
28.2s
Calculated
32.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
984km611mi
Calculated
558km347mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,991cc121cu in
2,295cc140cu in
Length
4,134mm163in
3,995mm157in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,715mm68in
Height
1,301mm51in
1,284mm51in
Wheelbase
2,430mm96in
2,400mm94in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,488mm59in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,485mm58in
Trunk volume
225L
145L
Max trunk volume
335L
348L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
53L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 KompressorPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor5,300 rpm2,500-4,800 rpm5,550 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.9 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.2 s
32.0 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.8 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.6 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
156 km/h
97 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
184 hp
137 kW
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
193 hp
144 kW

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor has 9 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 9 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
1,250 kg
2,756 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
227 km/h
141 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
984 km
611 mi
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
558 km
347 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
184 hp
137 kW
6.9 s
237 km/h
147 mph
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
193 hp
144 kW
7.3 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
3,995 mm
157.3 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Power
193 hp
144 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
6.9 s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
Power
184 hp
137 kW
193 hp
144 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.9 s
7.3 s
Top speed
237 km/h
147 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,250 kg
2,756 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
9.5 L/100 km
24.8 mpg US
29.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
225 L
7.9 cu ft
Length
4,134 mm
162.8 in
Height
1,301 mm
51.2 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
3,995 mm
157.3 in
Height
1,284 mm
50.6 in
Range score
984 km
611 mi
558 km
347 mi
Trunk score
225 L
7.9 cu ft
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
154 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km16.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi26.76 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year2,494 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 426 km (265 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 80 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor

  • Has 9 hp more
  • Is 155 kg lighter
  • Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 vs Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor - car comparison - FastVsFaster