BMW Z4 (G29)
Car comparison
BMW Z4 (G29) 20ivsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 200 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful197 hp147 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk281 L
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score32/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Lightest1,405 kg3,097 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range984 km611 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 197hp147kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,405kg3,097lb |
| Gross weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,795kg3,957lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 80.4s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 28.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 754km468mi Calculated | 984km611mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,324mm170in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,864mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,304mm51in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,470mm97in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 117mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 281L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 52L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 28.2 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 156 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW |
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW Z4 (G29) 20i and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 and BMW Z4 (G29) 20i: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 754 km 468 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 984 km 611 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 197 hp 147 kW | 6.8 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| BMWZ4 (G29)20i | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | BMWZ4 (G29)20i | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 200 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 197 hp 147 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,405 kg 3,097 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 754 km 468 mi | 984 km 611 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 281 L 9.9 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | BMW Z4 (G29) 20i | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 10.67 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,601 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
BMW Z4 (G29) 20i
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 56 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 200 2.0
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 230 km (143 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























