Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 230 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful354 hp264 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight249 hp/t186 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk145 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score26/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption13.6 L/100 km17.3 mpg US20.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range558 km347 mi
- Best economy score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 354hp264kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,420kg3,131lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,755kg3,869lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 77.1s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 536km333mi Calculated | 558km347mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,199cc195cu in | 2,295cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,010mm158in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,715mm68in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,269mm50in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,400mm94in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,477mm58in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 145L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | 348L | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 53L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 6,100 rpm | 4,400 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 has 161 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 161 hp (120 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 7.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 2.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 1.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 536 km 333 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 558 km 347 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 354 hp 264 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.3 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 |
| 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 354 hp 264 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.2 L/100 km 21.0 mpg US 25.2 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 536 km 333 mi | 558 km 347 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 249 hp/t 186 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.60 LC100 km | 16.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.54 LC100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,940 LC/year | 2,494 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
- Has 161 hp more
- Has 170 Nm more
- Is 2.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 43 km/h (27 mph) higher top speed
- Has 95 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 1.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 km (14 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























