AUDI TT Roadster (8N)
Car comparison
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 TvsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R170)
SLK 230 Kompressor
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range660 km410 mi
- Largest trunk180 L
- Best overall score46/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score28/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Lightest1,250 kg2,756 lb
- Best power-to-weight154 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,475kg3,252lb | 1,250kg2,756lb |
| Gross weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,585kg3,494lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.5s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 80.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 31.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 660km410mi Calculated | 570km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,781cc109cu in | 2,295cc140cu in |
| Length | 4,041mm159in | 3,995mm157in |
| Width | 1,764mm69in | 1,715mm68in |
| Height | 1,348mm53in | 1,284mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,429mm96in | 2,400mm94in |
| Front track | 1,528mm60in | 1,488mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,505mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Trunk volume | 180L | 145L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 348L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 53L |
| CO2 emissions | 226g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 5,900 rpm | 2,200 rpm | 6,150 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,800 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 31.2 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW |
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T has 32 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor and AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T: 32 hp (24 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 6.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 660 km 410 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 570 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 225 hp 168 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 193 hp 144 kW | 7.4 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDITT Roadster (8N)1.8 T | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,475 kg 3,252 lb | 1,250 kg 2,756 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 660 km 410 mi | 570 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 226 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 180 L 6.4 cu ft | 145 L 5.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 16.28 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 2,441 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI TT Roadster (8N) 1.8 T
- Has 32 hp more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) SLK 230 Kompressor
- Is 225 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























