Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque420 Nm310 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 420Nm310lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,671kg3,684lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.8s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 251Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,400cc146cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,635mm182in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,865mm73in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,776mm109in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,585mm62in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 380L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 68L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-3,000 rpm | 5,200 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.8 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.4 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.9 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 6 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.8 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 8.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 420 Nm 310 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.8 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,671 kg 3,684 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 120 Nm more
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 681 km (423 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 201 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























