Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range971 km603 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,470kg3,241lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 2,110kg4,652lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 569km354mi Calculated | 971km603mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,766mm188in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,442mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,588mm63in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,570mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 480L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 41L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 162g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 971 km 603 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.5 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 569 km 354 mi | 971 km 603 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 162 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 401 km (249 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























