Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,630kg3,594lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 75.7s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 971km603mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,766mm188in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 103 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 103 hp (77 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: 1.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.5 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 232 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 971 km 603 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 103 hp more
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Is 1.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 28 km/h (17 mph) higher top speed
- Has 71 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























