Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful177 hp132 kW
- Highest torque250 Nm184 lb-ft
- Best estimated range971 km603 mi
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight110 hp/t82 kW/t9.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,550kg3,417lb |
| Gross weight | 2,250kg4,960lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 75.6s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 110hp/t82kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 153Nm/t103lb-ft/ton Calculated | 161Nm/t108lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 971km603mi Calculated | 615km382mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 5,000-6,100 rpm | 1,400-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.9 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.3 s | 7.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 8.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 8.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 971 km 603 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 615 km 382 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.5 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.6 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,630 kg 3,594 lb | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 971 km 603 mi | 615 km 382 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 110 hp/t 82 kW/t 9.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,706 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 355 km (221 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 180
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























