Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 250dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,269 km789 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,775kg3,913lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,269km789mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,992cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 3,400-3,600 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 3,850 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 2.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 1,269 km 789 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.1 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,775 kg 3,913 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,269 km 789 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 250d
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 700 km (435 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























