Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.0 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Lightest1,470 kg3,241 lb
- Best power-to-weight125 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,470kg3,241lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 125hp/t93kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 569km354mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,570mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 833 km 518 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 569 km 354 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.4 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,470 kg 3,241 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 569 km 354 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 125 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 264 km (164 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























