Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,720 kg3,792 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t88 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.7s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 658km409mi Calculated | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,496cc91cu in | 1,992cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,766mm188in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 3,200-4,400 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.7 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 has 41 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 1,320 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 658 km 409 mi | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 41 hp more
- Is 10 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 662 km (411 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























