Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250dvsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Best power-to-weight127 hp/t94 kW/t7.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score93/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,610kg3,549lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 2,165kg4,773lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 127hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 311Nm/t208lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,143cc131cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,405mm55in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,563mm62in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 400L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 2 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 132g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-1,800 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 2.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 658 km 409 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 250d | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 132 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 400 L 14.1 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 127 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class Coupe (C205) C 250d
- Has 200 Nm more
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 342 km (213 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























