Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
C 200
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.3s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 29.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 658km409mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,496cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,755mm187in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,584mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,582mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 490L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,510L |
| Doors | 4 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 5,800-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 29.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 154 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 76 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 76 hp (57 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 231 km/h 144 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 7.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200: 0.8 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 200 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 231 km/h 144 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 658 km 409 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 76 hp more
- Has 85 Nm more
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 29 km/h (18 mph) higher top speed
- Has 61 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 200
- Has 60 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























