Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight99 hp/t74 kW/t10.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d 1992 cc
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.7s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.2s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.3s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 889km552mi Calculated | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,992cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,766mm188in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,601mm63in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,613mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.2 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 163 hp 122 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d 1992 cc: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d 1992 cc: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 889 km 552 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 1,320 km 820 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d1993 cc | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d1992 cc | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 889 km 552 mi | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d 1992 cc |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.88 LC100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,181 LC/year | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d 1993 cc
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d 1992 cc
- Has 431 km (268 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























