Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight111 hp/t83 kW/t9.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk490 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.7 s
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range889 km552 mi
- Best economy score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,800kg3,968lb | 1,650kg3,638lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.8s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 68.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.5s Calculated | 29.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated | 99hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 244Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 889km552mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,993cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,755mm187in | 4,751mm187in |
| Width | 1,841mm72in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,437mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,584mm62in | 1,601mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,582mm62in | 1,613mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 490L | 455L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,510L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 40L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.5 s | 29.2 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has 37 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 37 hp (28 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 7.7 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 714 km 444 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 889 km 552 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 7.7 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,800 kg 3,968 lb | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 889 km 552 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 490 L 17.3 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 99 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class All-Terrain C 220d
- Has 37 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 200d
- Is 150 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 175 km (108 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























