Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
C 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful280 hp209 kW
- Highest torque385 Nm284 lb-ft
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight179 hp/t134 kW/t5.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score61/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 280hp209kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 385Nm284lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,560kg3,439lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,350kg5,181lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 31.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.6L/100 km17.3mpg US20.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 179hp/t134kW/t81hp/1000 lb Calculated | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 1,320km820mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,606cc220cu in | 1,992cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,487mm177in | 4,766mm188in |
| Width | 1,720mm68in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,385mm55in | 1,438mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,497mm59in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,478mm58in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000-4,750 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 3,200-4,400 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 31.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 105 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 has 117 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36: 117 hp (87 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 6.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 8.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: 1.4 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | 280 hp 209 kW | 6.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)AMG C 36 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 280 hp 209 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 385 Nm 284 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 1,320 km 820 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 179 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) AMG C 36
- Has 117 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 32 km/h (20 mph) higher top speed
- Has 85 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























