Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) · Facelift 2026 C 200dvsMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
C 180
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful163 hp122 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,320 km820 mi
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score49/100
- Best economy score93/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight116 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk480 L
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 163hp122kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,730kg3,814lb | 1,350kg2,976lb |
| Gross weight | 2,350kg5,181lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.3s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.6s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 94hp/t70kW/t43hp/1000 lb Calculated | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,320km820mi Calculated | 651km404mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,992cc122cu in | 1,595cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,766mm188in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,442mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,840mm112in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,570mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 92mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 480L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 41L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 142g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 3,200-4,400 rpm | 1,600-2,800 rpm | 4,650 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 5,300 rpm | 1,200-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.6 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d has 7 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 1,320 km 820 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 651 km 404 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.3 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d |
| 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)Facelift 2026C 200d | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 180 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 163 hp 122 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.0 L/100 km 47.0 mpg US 56.5 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,320 km 820 mi | 651 km 404 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 142 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 480 L 17.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 94 hp/t 70 kW/t 10.6 kg/hp | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.75 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.08 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 750 L198 US gal165 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,313 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) Facelift 2026 C 200d
- Has 7 hp more
- Has 130 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 669 km (416 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 180
- Is 380 kg lighter
- Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























