Car comparison

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mazda CX-80

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

254 hp3283 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2024-present
VS

Volkswagen Teramont Pro

450TSI

272 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2025-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph Unrestricted
    219 km/h
    136 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    550 Nm
    406 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    2,136 kg
    4,709 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,276 km
    793 mi
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.6 s
  • Most powerful
    272 hp
    203 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    126 hp/t
    94 kW/t
    7.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    286 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Power
254hp189kW
272hp203kW
Torque
550Nm406lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
2,136kg4,709lb
2,155kg4,751lb
Gross weight
2,781kg6,131lb
2,715kg5,986lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
82.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
7.6s
0-200 km/h
40.9s
Calculated
50.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.9s
Calculated
7.2s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28.2mpg US33.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
15.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
257Nm/t172lb-ft/ton
Calculated
186Nm/t124lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,276km793mi
Calculated
838km521mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,283cc200cu in
1,984cc121cu in
Length
4,995mm197in
5,158mm203in
Width
1,890mm74in
1,991mm78in
Height
1,710mm67in
1,788mm70in
Wheelbase
3,120mm123in
2,980mm117in
Front track
1,640mm65in
1,704mm67in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,719mm68in
Ground clearance
170mm7in
-
Trunk volume
258L
286L
Max trunk volume
1,971L
2,427L
Doors
5
5
Seats
6
7
Fuel tank
74L
70L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSIPowerTorque
  • Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D3,750 rpm1,500-2,400 rpm4,000 rpm
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI5,000-6,500 rpm1,700-4,500 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.9 s
7.2 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
7.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
40.9 s
50.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
15.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
144 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
272 hp
203 kW

Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI has 18 hp more than Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
2,155 kg
4,751 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI7.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI and Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.2 mpg US
33.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,276 km
793 mi
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
838 km
521 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
254 hp
189 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
272 hp
203 kW
7.6 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,158 mm
203.1 in
Height
1,788 mm
70.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
254 hp
189 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Power
272 hp
203 kW
0-100 km/h7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.2 mpg US
33.8 mpg UK

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 s
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.2 mpg US
33.8 mpg UK
7.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.2 mpg US
33.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DVolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSI
Power
254 hp
189 kW
272 hp
203 kW
Torque
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
7.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
225 km/h140 mph
Restricted
219 km/h136 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
2,136 kg
4,709 lb
2,155 kg
4,751 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.2 mpg US
33.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
6 seats
Trunk
258 L
9.1 cu ft
Length
4,995 mm
196.7 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Length
5,158 mm
203.1 in
Height
1,788 mm
70.4 in
Range score
1,276 km
793 mi
838 km
521 mi
Trunk score
258 L
9.1 cu ft
286 L
10.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv DVolkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28.2 mpg US33.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km14.61 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi23.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,253 L331 US gal276 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year2,192 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 19 kg lighter
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 438 km (272 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 28 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450TSI
530 V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSIvsVolkswagenTeramontFacelift 2021530 V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
EQE 300 100 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzEQE SUV (X294)EQE 300 100 kWh
450TSI
3.6 FSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSIvsVolkswagenTeramont3.6 FSI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
450TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSIvsVolkswagenTayron II2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
28T
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsCadillacGT428T
450TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.0 V6 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsVolkswagenTouareg III (CR)Facelift 20233.0 V6 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLB 250+ 85 kWh
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X244)GLB 250+ 85 kWh
450TSI
530 TSI V6
VS
VolkswagenTeramont Pro450TSIvsVolkswagenTalagon530 TSI V6
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
Mazda CX-80 3.3 e-Skyactiv D vs Volkswagen Teramont Pro 450TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster