Mazda CX-60
Car comparison
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DvsTenet T8 2.0 TGDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTenet T8
2.0 TGDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph Unrestricted212 km/h132 mph Restricted
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,184 km736 mi
- Largest trunk477 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI
- Lightest1,864 kg4,109 lb
- Best power-to-weight106 hp/t79 kW/t9.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | TenetT82.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 197hp147kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 375Nm277lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,905kg4,200lb | 1,864kg4,109lb |
| Gross weight | 2,500kg5,512lb | 2,467kg5,439lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Calculated | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 87.8s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.1s Calculated | 53.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.9s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton Calculated | 201Nm/t135lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,184km736mi Calculated | 648km402mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,283cc200cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,745mm187in | 4,725mm186in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,687mm66in | 1,705mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,582mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 175mm7in | 196mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 477L | 193L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,726L | 1,930L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 57L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 200g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
- Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 3,000-4,200 rpm | 1,400-3,000 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 5,500 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | TenetT82.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.1 s | 53.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph Limited | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 142 km/h 88 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 197 hp 147 kW |
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D has 3 hp more than Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI.
The biggest power difference is between Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 3 hp (2 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 8.4 s |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 8.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 1,184 km 736 mi |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 648 km 402 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.4 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 197 hp 147 kW | 8.4 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TenetT82.0 TGDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| TenetT82.0 TGDI |
| 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| TenetT82.0 TGDI | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D | TenetT82.0 TGDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 197 hp 147 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 375 Nm 277 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 212 km/h132 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,905 kg 4,200 lb | 1,864 kg 4,109 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km 26.7 mpg US 32.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,184 km 736 mi | 648 km 402 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 200 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 477 L 16.8 cu ft | 193 L 6.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 105 hp/t 78 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D | Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 15.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 24.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 1,320 L349 US gal290 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 2,310 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
- Has 3 hp more
- Has 75 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 536 km (333 mi) more estimated range
- Has 284 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Tenet T8 2.0 TGDI
- Is 41 kg lighter
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























