Car comparison

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDIvsMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Seat Tarraco

2.0 TDI

200 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2020-2023
VS

Mazda CX-60

3.3 e-Skyactiv D

200 hp3283 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    220 km/h
    137 mph Unrestricted
    210 km/h
    130 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Lightest
    1,705 kg
    3,759 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    117 hp/t
    87 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    760 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    92/100

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,184 km
    736 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSeatTarraco2.0 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200hp149kW
200hp149kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,705kg3,759lb
1,905kg4,200lb
Gross weight
2,380kg5,247lb
2,500kg5,512lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
84.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
96.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
39.3s
Calculated
44.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
7.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton
Calculated
236Nm/t158lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
857km533mi
Calculated
1,184km736mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
3,283cc200cu in
Length
4,735mm186in
4,745mm187in
Width
1,839mm72in
1,890mm74in
Height
1,674mm66in
1,687mm66in
Wheelbase
2,790mm110in
2,870mm113in
Front track
1,575mm62in
1,640mm65in
Rear track
1,564mm62in
1,645mm65in
Ground clearance
192mm8in
175mm7in
Trunk volume
760L
477L
Max trunk volume-
1,726L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L
CO2 emissions
183g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv DPowerTorque
  • Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI3,600-4,100 rpm1,750-3,500 rpm4,350 rpm
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D3,000-4,200 rpm1,400-3,000 rpm4,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSeatTarraco2.0 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
7.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
39.3 s
44.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
146 km/h
91 mph
142 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,905 kg
4,200 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI7.8 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 2.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
857 km
533 mi
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
1,184 km
736 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
200 hp
149 kW
7.8 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
200 hp
149 kW
8.4 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
760 L
26.8 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SeatTarraco2.0 TDI
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSeatTarraco2.0 TDIMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
Power
200 hp
149 kW
200 hp
149 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
212 km/h132 mph
Lightness
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
1,905 kg
4,200 lb
Fuel consumption
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
760 L
26.8 cu ft
Length
4,735 mm
186.4 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Length
4,745 mm
186.8 in
Height
1,687 mm
66.4 in
Range score
857 km
533 mi
1,184 km
736 mi
CO2 score
183 g/km
-
Trunk score
760 L
26.8 cu ft
477 L
16.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
117 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSeat Tarraco 2.0 TDIMazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Consumption7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.25 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.71 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,838 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 283 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 327 km (203 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
1.5 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20211.5 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 e-Skyactiv X
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv X
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-803.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
1.5 TSI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsSeatAronaFacelift 20251.5 TSI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0d
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.0 TDI
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsSeatTarraco2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
40 TDI
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsAUDIQ3 II (F3)40 TDI
2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
2.2d
VS
MazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv DvsMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
2.0 TDI
GLA 220d
VS
SeatTarraco2.0 TDIvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI vs Mazda CX-60 3.3 e-Skyactiv D - car comparison - FastVsFaster