AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
AUDI Q5 II (FY) · Facelift 2020 40 TDIvsSeat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Tarraco
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,204 km748 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score92/100
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Lightest1,705 kg3,759 lb
- Best power-to-weight117 hp/t87 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk760 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,805kg3,979lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,380kg5,247lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 84.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 84.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.4s Calculated | 39.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 113hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,204km748mi Calculated | 857km533mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,735mm186in |
| Width | 1,893mm75in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,662mm65in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,819mm111in | 2,790mm110in |
| Front track | 1,616mm64in | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,609mm63in | 1,564mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 192mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 520L | 760L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,520L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: Power / Torque
- Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 3,800-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 3,600-4,100 rpm | 1,750-3,500 rpm | 4,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.4 s | 39.3 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW |
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI has 4 hp more than Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI and AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 7.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI and Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 1,204 km 748 mi |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 857 km 533 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.6 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
| SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ5 II (FY)Facelift 202040 TDI | SeatTarraco2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,204 km 748 mi | 857 km 533 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 520 L 18.4 cu ft | 760 L 26.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 113 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI | Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.45 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,418 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q5 II (FY) Facelift 2020 40 TDI
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 347 km (215 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Seat Tarraco 2.0 TDI
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 240 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























