Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220dvsMazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017

GLA 220d

177 hp2143 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015

2.2d

175 hp2191 ccDieselAWDManualTwin-turboSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    177 hp
    132 kW
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.9 L/100 km
    39.9 mpg US
    47.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,120 km
    696 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Highest torque
    420 Nm
    310 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,480 kg
    3,263 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    503 L
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
177hp132kW
175hp130kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
420Nm310lb-ft
Curb weight
1,520kg3,351lb
1,480kg3,263lb
Gross weight
2,090kg4,608lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
To 99% top speed
76.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.6s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.7s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
38.0s
Calculated
61.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.3s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton
Calculated
284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,120km696mi
Calculated
1,115km693mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,143cc131cu in
2,191cc134cu in
Length
4,424mm174in
4,555mm179in
Width
1,804mm71in
1,840mm72in
Height
1,494mm59in
1,710mm67in
Wheelbase
2,699mm106in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,569mm62in
-
Rear track
1,560mm61in
-
Ground clearance-
210mm8in
Trunk volume
421L
503L
Max trunk volume
1,235L
1,620L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
56L
58L
CO2 emissions-
136g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220dMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2dPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
  • Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d3,600-3,800 rpm1,400-3,400 rpm4,050 rpm
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d4,500 rpm2,000 rpm4,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.3 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.7 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
38.0 s
61.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.1 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
177 hp
132 kW
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d has 2 hp more than Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d.

The biggest power difference is between Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d and Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
420 Nm
310 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,480 kg
3,263 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
218 km/h
135 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
207 km/h
129 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d7.7 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d and Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
1,120 km
696 mi
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
1,115 km
693 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
177 hp
132 kW
7.7 s
218 km/h
135 mph
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
175 hp
130 kW
8.8 s
207 km/h
129 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
Power
177 hp
132 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
175 hp
130 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
207 km/h
129 mph
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
7.7 s
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220d
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dMazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2d
Power
177 hp
132 kW
175 hp
130 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
420 Nm
310 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.7 s
8.8 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
207 km/h
129 mph
Lightness
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
1,480 kg
3,263 lb
Fuel consumption
5.0 L/100 km
47.0 mpg US
56.5 mpg UK
5.2 L/100 km
45.2 mpg US
54.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
421 L
14.9 cu ft
Length
4,424 mm
174.2 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,555 mm
179.3 in
Height
1,710 mm
67.3 in
Range score
1,120 km
696 mi
1,115 km
693 mi
CO2 score
-
136 g/km
Trunk score
421 L
14.9 cu ft
503 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
116 hp/t
87 kW/t
8.6 kg/hp
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220dMazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d
Consumption5 L/100 km47 mpg US56.5 mpg UK5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.75 LC100 km9.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi14.08 LC100 mi14.65 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used750 L198 US gal165 UK gal780 L206 US gal172 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,313 LC/year1,365 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) Facelift 2017 GLA 220d

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 5 km (3 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mazda CX-5 Facelift 2015 2.2d

  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 82 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) GLA 220d
Mazda CX-5 2.2d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GLA 220d
GLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (X156)GLA 220d
2.2d
2.0i
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-32.0i
GLA 220d
GLA 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 220d
2.2d
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
GLA 220d
GLA 220
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220
2.2d
2.0 Skyactiv-X
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-302.0 Skyactiv-X
GLA 220d
GLB 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)GLB 220d
2.2d
2.0d
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
GLA 220d
GLB 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220d
GLA 220d
2.2d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsAlfa RomeoStelvio (949)2.2d
2.2d
3.3 e-Skyactiv D
VS
MazdaCX-5Facelift 20152.2dvsMazdaCX-603.3 e-Skyactiv D
GLA 220d
GLS 350d
VS
Mercedes-BenzGLA (X156)Facelift 2017GLA 220dvsMercedes-BenzGLS (X166)GLS 350d
Mercedes-Benz GLA (X156) · Facelift 2017 GLA 220d vs Mazda CX-5 · Facelift 2015 2.2d - car comparison - FastVsFaster